Because Forensics does, eventually, get boring.
Here’s the definitions for those who are curious.
I’ve had a bit of an epiphany here with this.
All the characters I truly detest are Lawful Evil. I’ve never really put it together like that until now. I like Chaotic Evil because it is INTERESTING. Neutral Evil is useful, along with Lawful Neutral. Lawful Good exists to give us hope, even if they are not very interesting. Neutral Good exists to give us something to identify with, because the majority of the population pins themselves with this definition. Chaotic Good is generally the comedic relief, while also being someone to identify with (us tumblrites will fall into this category, generally). Neutral neutral is the pinion point by which we can measure all others, a solid round character. And chaotic neutral is always the wild card, which is never boring.
Which leaves Lawful Evil as those that should know better and choose not to be, or bumble into a problem and make it worse. They can be manipulated as others cannot be, and that is where I have the most issue. I suppose feeling something towards a character is better than nothing, but a Lawful Evil is the quickest way for me to grow to dislike a character.
(via dduane)
I just see John as the more free spirit type than Molly. Both Chaotic Good and Neutral Good have some moral ambiguities,...
Hi! I’m the chick who made the thing—may I ask why you’d switch them? I’d love to hear your reasoning. It’s why I made...
oh my gog this is the best thing I have seen in a long time